Within bosom of the Catholic Church and of Christianity itself, arise numerous controversies and disputes over the image and figure of Jesus, the unfathomable search for the truth of Jesus, the concern in the analysis of his life and time on earth, more than ever keep alive the faith and to Jesus himself.
This controversy is caused by the acceptance of the historical or liturgical (God) of Jesus, these two consequences inherent in life and passing of Christ on earth, cause of debate among the experts and specialist in Christology worldwide.
taboo certainly the origin of some of the questions that scholars are made on the image and figure of Jesus Christ, raised hackles within the heart of Christianity, that God irreversibility on the issue and dogmatic unquestionably make the image from some points of view of analysis as some would put to it. José Antonio Pagola
English priest, theologian in Scripture and a diploma in Biblical Studies from the Catholic school in Jerusalem, the debate and controversy rages between those who hold a vision of God (liturgical) and history of Jesus Christ, challenging and asking questions that border on heresy, but from the standpoint of scientific and subjective truth are deserving of answers to a better understanding of the truth about Christ Man or Christ God. Pagola
says from his theory that historical research itself throws enough light, but critics argue that he, from his historical approach system dispenses the Old Testament, the apostolic tradition and teaching, about what they Jesus taught today ...
Pagola
argues that even relevant theologians and researchers praised by the Pope as Meier, Gnilka , Schlosser Barbagli or do not study the divinity of Jesus, the supernatural character of the miracles, the salvific value of the death of Jesus Christ or the sacramental theology of the Eucharist, even quoted saying the investigation Meier historical - no criticism of the sources and means to reach a definitive conclusion on its own historicity of the virginal conception as narrated by the Gospels of Matthew and Luke ...
And on the design, understanding of miracles, Pagola said: "This more beyond the specific field of the historian or exegete ... "in the words of Meier, who Barbagli apostille that" ... Does not follow that the healer of Nazareth has tried to legitimize itself in this way as a prophet or God sent ... "Well
!, Whatever the reasons for Christ, the truth is that the controversy within the bosom of the Catholic Church as Christianity is served, especially if it is understood that to reach a greater understanding and knowledge of Jesus himself, maybe we should rub it shocking or taboo, for moral and dogmatic conception of the figure in order to understand more, something that of course you let the readers view of Christology so that from this post, think and reflect on Christ to stay ...
Regards, waiting your comments if you see them timely ...
Jyhael
This controversy is caused by the acceptance of the historical or liturgical (God) of Jesus, these two consequences inherent in life and passing of Christ on earth, cause of debate among the experts and specialist in Christology worldwide.
taboo certainly the origin of some of the questions that scholars are made on the image and figure of Jesus Christ, raised hackles within the heart of Christianity, that God irreversibility on the issue and dogmatic unquestionably make the image from some points of view of analysis as some would put to it. José Antonio Pagola
English priest, theologian in Scripture and a diploma in Biblical Studies from the Catholic school in Jerusalem, the debate and controversy rages between those who hold a vision of God (liturgical) and history of Jesus Christ, challenging and asking questions that border on heresy, but from the standpoint of scientific and subjective truth are deserving of answers to a better understanding of the truth about Christ Man or Christ God. Pagola
says from his theory that historical research itself throws enough light, but critics argue that he, from his historical approach system dispenses the Old Testament, the apostolic tradition and teaching, about what they Jesus taught today ...
Pagola
argues that even relevant theologians and researchers praised by the Pope as Meier, Gnilka , Schlosser Barbagli or do not study the divinity of Jesus, the supernatural character of the miracles, the salvific value of the death of Jesus Christ or the sacramental theology of the Eucharist, even quoted saying the investigation Meier historical - no criticism of the sources and means to reach a definitive conclusion on its own historicity of the virginal conception as narrated by the Gospels of Matthew and Luke ...
And on the design, understanding of miracles, Pagola said: "This more beyond the specific field of the historian or exegete ... "in the words of Meier, who Barbagli apostille that" ... Does not follow that the healer of Nazareth has tried to legitimize itself in this way as a prophet or God sent ... "Well
!, Whatever the reasons for Christ, the truth is that the controversy within the bosom of the Catholic Church as Christianity is served, especially if it is understood that to reach a greater understanding and knowledge of Jesus himself, maybe we should rub it shocking or taboo, for moral and dogmatic conception of the figure in order to understand more, something that of course you let the readers view of Christology so that from this post, think and reflect on Christ to stay ...
Regards, waiting your comments if you see them timely ...
Jyhael
0 comments:
Post a Comment